§17200 Practice
New Challenges…New Opportunities
Proposition 64 effected the most sweeping change in Section 17200 practice in over 40 years. It eliminated the "unaffected plaintiff" standing rule that had prevailed for decades. And it eliminated "representative" actions - the so-called "nonclass class" action. But Proposition 64 also left many important questions unanswered:
- How to establish standing?
- Does Prop. 64 require proof of "reliance"?
- What does the "injury in fact" standard mean?
- What test of "unfair" applies in consumer cases?
- Is the "likely to mislead" test of "fraudulent" business practices overruled?
- What kinds of losses qualify for "restitution"?
- What does "lost money or property" mean?
- Have "omissions" cases changed under the Prop. 64 standard?
- How are private injunction actions affected?
- Did Prop. 64 narrow or eliminate competitor cases?
- What must be shown to get a UCL class certified?
Whether you represent plaintiffs or defendants, businesses or consumers, you need to know about the UCL's extraordinary reach and how it has been affected by Proposition 64. You'll hear it first-hand from our expert panelists - the principal author of Proposition 64, the former President of the Consumer Attorneys of California, and our moderator, Justice Croskey.
Call for more information or to enroll:
818-990-3260 (Ext. 2) or 1-800-747-3161 (Ext. 2)
Highlights
Comprehensive Review of Proposition 64
Creative Uses of §17200
| |
Wage/Hour |
| |
Consumer Claims |
| |
False Advertising |
| |
Insurance Bad Faith |
| |
Banking |
| |
Competitor Suits |
Consumers Legal Remedies Act
Discovery in UCL Cases
Attorney Fees Awards
Injunctions
Settlement Strategies
Class Actions
Defenses and Counterclaims
Restitution
Procedure Tactics
Arbitration
New Cases
| | CashCall, Inc. v. Sup. Ct. |
| Williams v. Gerber Prods. Co. |
| Buller v. Sutter Health |
| Ostreicher v. Alienware Corp. |
| Silvas v. E*Trade Mortg. Co. |
| Altria Group, Inc. v. Good |
| Peterson v. Cellco Partnership |
| Medina v. Safe-Guard Prods., Int'l, Inc. |
| Meyer v. Sprint Spectrum L.P. |
Presenters
JUSTICE H. WALTER CROSKEY
Calif. Court of Appeal
2nd Dist., Div. 3
MODERATOR
WILLIAM L. STERN
Morrison & Foerster LLP
San Francisco
SHARON J. ARKIN
Arkin & Glovsky
Pasadena
Dates / Times / Locations
Registration: 5:30 PM · Program: 6:00 - 9:15 PM
LIVE PROGRAMS:
SAN FRANCISCO
TUESDAY, MARCH 3
HOTEL NIKKO SAN FRANCISCO
222 Mason Street
(415) 394-1111
LOS ANGELES
THURSDAY, MARCH 5
LOS ANGELES MARRIOTT DOWNTOWN
333 S. Figueroa Street
(213) 617-1133
VIDEO REPLAYS:
SAN DIEGO
MONDAY, MARCH 16
THE WESTIN GASLAMP QUARTER SAN DIEGO
910 Broadway Circle
(619) 239-2200
COSTA MESA
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 18
WESTIN SOUTH COAST PLAZA
686 Anton Blvd.
(714) 540-2500
SHERMAN OAKS
THURSDAY, MARCH 19
COURTYARD BY MARRIOTT
15433 Ventura Boulevard
(818) 981-5400
CLE Credit
3 HOURS MCLE CREDIT (including 0.5 Hour Legal Ethics) The Rutter Group certifies that this activity has been approved for MCLE credit by The State Bar of California in the amount of 3 hours, of which 0.5 hour applies toward Legal Ethics
Tuition
TRG Seminar PASSholders (admission only) - FREE
- with Bus. & Prof.C. §17200 Practice Book - $150 (plus applicable sales tax)
TUITION including Bus. & Prof.C. §17200 Practice Book - $310
- ADD applicable sales tax on $150 Practice Book
- DEDUCT $150 if you already own the Practice Book. (No additional copy will be provided.)
The Rutter Group • A Division of West, a Thomson Reuters business • 15760 Ventura Boulevard, Suite 630 • Encino, CA 91436 • (818) 990-3260 or (800) 747-3161

Replacement Pages | © 2012 The Rutter Group. All rights reserved. Shop for West Legal Products
|